Home arrow the issues arrow Pigs
Help Voiceless stop cruelty to animals!

Did you like this article?
Facebook! Twitter
 

 

Dr Charlie Teo, Voiceless Council member and renowned neurosurgeon

"It's all a matter of awareness - if the public were aware...of what was going on, then they'd rise up in arms. And they have." Dr Charlie Teo, 702 ABC Sydney, 06 June 2011,
read more

 

"History will view us as philistines for the way we treated animals." Dr Charlie Teo,
 read more

 

"I think that the first thing we need to do is become aware of where our food comes from and how farm animals are treated. If more people became aware of these things there would be huge public outcry, which would lead to change." Dr Charlie Teo, 2010, read more 




The Issues

The Issues
Factory Farming
Live Export
Pigs
Chickens
Kangaroos
Labelling Report
Dairy cows
animal sentience
climate change
Pigs Print E-mail

 

Australians have had a love affair with ham, pork and bacon for generations, with the great Aussie breakfast of bacon and eggs a part of our national diet. Yet the farming of pigs has changed rapidly over the past generation. Family farms have been run out of business, unable to compete with larger factory-style operations.[1]  The implications for the welfare of pigs have been appalling, yet largely invisible to the Australian consumer.

cruel treatment on factory farms

pregnancy hell for mother pigs

The sad reality for the vast majority of mother pigs now is that they no longer forage in the earth in the open air a la Old Macdonald’s farm, but are confined for most of their lives to concrete-floored, metal barred stalls so cramped that they cannot turn around, and can only take one step forward or backwards. To give birth they are confined even more restrictively, in a concreted area called a farrowing crate so small they can hardly move.[2]

Mother pigs are repeatedly impregnated throughout their lives and must feed, lie and give birth in these conditions, until the size of the litter they are able to produce declines and they are usually killed at about 2 years of age.[3] They are akin to battery hens.

Extended confinement in sow stalls has been associated with other serious health problems, including reduced bone strength and muscle weight[4], impaired locomotion and high lameness[5]. Confinement in sow crates can also cause stereotypies; repetitive purposeless behaviour which is a sign of suffering.[6]

Young

Piglets in factory farms are prevented from snuggling up to their mothers in the normal way due to the presence of steel bars in farrowing crates. The babies are also taken away or ‘weaned’ prematurely and the stress of abrupt weaning results in piglets having a high incidence of clinical disease and diarrhoea.[7] Male piglets are routinely castrated without anaesthetic, a practice so painful that it can provoke vomiting, trembling and leg shaking.[8] Piglets’ teeth are clipped which may cause up to 15 days of extreme pain.[9] No pain relief is required by law.

Porkers

Pigs born on factory farms and used to produce meat generally spend their whole life indoors. They are housed in crowded, concrete-floored sheds with thousands of others and with no natural materials . They are moved from pen to pen as they grow bigger, before eventually being loaded onto trucks for transportation to the slaughterhouse. For many of them, this trip is the only chance they have in their whole lives to experience life outdoors and to feel the wind and the sun.

Scientific research proves that some factory-farmed pigs suffer prolonged depression because they are denied natural light, space and the opportunity to forage for food in natural surroundings.[10]

why the law is not on their side

The current Code which regulates the treatment of pigs in Australia, Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals - Pigs (revised) (2007) (the Pig Code)[11] entrenches the cruelties described above. Some of the cruel practices it permits are:

  • Pregnant sows may be confined for the duration of their 16 week pregnancy in individual sow stalls, measuring no more than 0.6 x 2.2m. These stalls, which have been associated with physical disorders, chronic stress and depression[12], are so small that female pigs cannot even turn around.

From about 2017:

    • The maximum time for holding pregnant pigs in sow stalls will reduce to 6 weeks. This is two weeks more than the minimum standard being introduced by the European Union[13] and New Zealand[14].
    • Sows may be confined for up to 6 weeks of each reproductive cycle in farrowing crates (or longer ‘in an emergency’), before their young are prematurely weaned. These crates, which measure 0.5 x 2m, are even smaller than sow stalls.
  • Pig producers are not obligated to provide access to the outdoors where pigs can engage in natural behaviours such as grazing, wallowing in mud, walking around and nosing or manipulating their environment. 
  • Painful mutilations of young piglets, including tail docking, teeth clipping and castration without pain relief, continue to be permitted. 
  • Natural materials such as straw for sleeping and nesting, while encouraged, are not mandatory, rendering many pigs subject to a miserable life on concrete floors.

The international experience

Sow stalls are already banned in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Finland. The entire European Union will follow from 2013 (except for the first four weeks of pregnancy)[15] and New Zealand by the end of 2015[16]. Sow stalls are also banned in Florida and are being phased out in Arizona, California, Colorado, Maine, Michigan and Oregon in the United States[17]. Two of the largest pork producers in the US and Canada have also announced their plans to phase out sow stalls. 

As other countries take steps to ban sow stalls, Australia is lagging shamefully behind.

recent news

The announcement of reforms at the state level, and by the retail sector and industry, indicate that the national Pig Code is inadequate in protecting animal welfare.

In 2010, the Tasmanian Government announced that it would restrict the time that pregnant sows can be housed in sow stalls from 2014, and implement a total ban by 2017. The government acted on the advice of its Animal Welfare Advisory Committee, which had conducted a detailed consideration of the relevant science pertaining to welfare and productivity of intensively reared sows.[18]

Retailers in Australia are also making significant moves towards supporting free-range pig products. In 2010, major food retailer Coles announced that from 2014 it will not source pork (including imported pork products) from any supplier which uses sow stalls.

Apparently in response to these events, Australian Pork Limited (APL), the peak industry body, announced that it would “commit to pursuing the voluntary phasing out of the use of gestation stalls by 2017”. But this commitment should be viewed with scepticism for three reasons; it is in no way binding; APL makes the contradictory claim that “Australian pork producers recognise the welfare benefits of gestation stalls…”[19]; and there is an inherent conflict of interest in such self-regulation.

Since a voluntary industry-wide ban is unlikely, the desperately needed ban on sow stalls in Australia must come from the federal government.

pigs have feelings too 

All of the above occurs despite the scientific consensus that pigs are highly intelligent and social beings.

Few species are more social than pigs: they form close bonds, cooperate with and defend one another. More than 20 pig vocalisations have been identified. They have an elaborate courting ritual including a song between males and females. Newborn piglets learn to run to their mother’s voice and the mother pig sings to her young while nursing. After nursing, a piglet sometimes runs to her mother’s face to rub snouts and grunt.[20]

When she is ready to give birth, a pregnant pig can walk 5-10km to search for a good nest site and gather bedding materials.[21]

Pigs are recognized to be at least as good at problem-solving as dogs. Scientists have discovered that pigs ‘have an understanding of what is going on in other pigs’ minds and make their own decisions according to what they want.’ This type of thinking has often been assumed to be unique to apes and humans.[22]

together, we can make a difference

Write a letter to your local paper, go on talk-back radio or contact your local council. Share your concerns about the treatment of pigs and help others become more informed about the issue.

  • Write a letter to your local Member of Parliament and to the Minister responsible for Animal Welfare in your State or Territory. Ask them to outlaw the factory farming of pigs or, at the very least, to introduce a proper labelling system that enables consumers to make animal-friendly choices at the supermarket. For more on the issues surrounding animal-derived food product labelling, see Voiceless’s report From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy, available to download as a pdf
  • Every time you go to a supermarket, fast-food outlet, restaurant or café, encourage them to consider the welfare of pigs by asking questions about where they purchase their pork/ham/bacon.
  • Replace pig products with other delicious and healthy ingredients such as: lentils, potatoes, chick peas or tofu. There are even ‘mock meat’ alternatives available from health food stores and specialty shops. 
  • If you eat pork/ham/bacon, try to cut down on the amount you eat and always choose accredited free-range or certified organic products. 
  • Support an animal protection group financially, or by volunteering your time, services or skills.

Find out more about what you can do as a:

voiceless links:

In late 2006, Voiceless joined with Animals Australia, the Berg Family Foundation and Hunter Hall International Limited to form the ‘Prisons to Paddocks’ alliance, which launched an unprecedented national advertising campaign to highlight the plight of factory farmed pigs in Australia. 

Voiceless published a report on the NSW pig industry, titled “From Paddocks to Prisons: Pigs in NSW Current Practices, Future Directions”.

You can also read Voiceless’s submission on the Revised Code.

recommended reading and resources

We encourage you to find out more about pigs – both how they may be treated and what they are capable of.  See, for example, the following resources:

Last Updated on 6 September 2011



  1. Productivity Commission 2005, Australian Pigmeat Industry, Report no. 35, Melbourne, p 6. http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiry/pigmeat/finalreport/pigmeat.pdf
  2. Dr Suzanne Pope, ‘Critical Pathways in Welfare for the Pig’, unpublished report, 2000; in CIWF, Stop-Look-Listen: Recognising the sentience of farm animals, 2003
  3. Marchant-Forde JN.  Welfare of dry sows.  In The Welfare of Pigs.  Ed JN Marchant Forde.  Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, 2009a
  4. Marchant JN, Broom DM.  Effects of dry sow housing conditions on muscle weight and bone strength.  Anim Sci 1996;62:105-113.
  5. Karlen GAM, Hemsworth PH, Gonyou HW, Fabrega E, Strom AD, Smits RJ. The welfare of gestating sows in conventional stalls and large groups on deep litter.  Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007;105:87-101.
  6. European Commission - Scientific Veterinary Committee,Animal Welfare Section, Report on the welfare of intensively kept pigs, 30 September 1997. [26 May 2005] http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/oldcomm4/out17_en.pdf
  7. P. Baynes and M.Varley, ‘Gut health: practical considerations’, in M.A.Varley and J.Wiseman (eds) The Weaner Pig: Nutrition and Management CABI Publishing, 2001 chapter 12.
  8. F.Wemelsfelder and van Putten,‘Behaviour as a possible indicator for pain in piglets’ IVO Report B-260. Zeist:institute voor Veeteelkundig Onderzoek, quoted in A.F. Fraser and D.M. Broom Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare CABI Publishing 1997 Chapter 29.
  9. Hay M, Rue J, Sansac C, Brunel G, Prunier A.‘Long-term detrimental effects of tooth clipping or grinding in piglets: a histological approach’Animal Welfare Journal vol 13, issue 1, February 2004.
  10. European Commission - Scientific Veterinary Committee, above n. 6
  11. Animal Welfare Working Group - Primary Industries Ministerial Council, ‘Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals - Pigs (revised) (2007)’, April 2007, http://www.daff.gov.au/_media/documents/animal-plant/animal-welfare/mcopractice/pig-code.pdf
  12. J.L. Barnett, P.H Hemsworth and G.M. Cronin et al,A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing, Australian Journal for Agricultural Research, 2001, 52, 1-28, CSIRO Publishing.
  13. Commission Directive 2001/93/EC of 9 November 2001 amending Directive 91/630/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Official Journal L316, 1.12.2001, pp 36-38.
  14. National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee, Animal Welfare (Pigs) Code of Welfare 2010, December 2010, http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/regs/animal-welfare/req/codes/pigs/pigs-code-of-welfare.pdf
  15. Commission Directive 2001, 52, 1-28, above n. 13
  16.  Animal Welfare (Pigs) Code of Welfare 2010, above n. 14
  17. Florida - Florida Amendment Article X Section 19; Arizona -Proposition 204 - An Initiative Measure Proposing Amendment To Title 13, Chapter 29, Arizona Revised Statutes By Adding Section 13-2910.07; Relating To Cruel And Inhumane Confinement Of Animals; California – 2009 California Health and Safety Code - Section 25990-25994 :: Chapter 13.8. Farm Animal Cruelty; Colorado – Senate Bill 201 (SB 201); Maine - LD21 (An Act to Prohibit Cruel Confinement of Calves Raised for Veal and Sows During Gestation; Michigan – Michigan Public Act 2009-117; Oregon - SB 694, 74th Leg. Assembly, Regular Session
  18. Letter from Professor Rob White, Chairman of the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee to Minister Bryan Green, obtained by Voiceless from the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment.
  19. See http://www.australianpork.com.au/pages/images/Resolutions.pdf.
  20. S Held et al, Social tactics of pigs in a competitive foraging task: the ‘uniformed forager’ paradigm. Animal Behaviour 59: 569-576, 2000 quoted in CIWF, Stop-Look-Listen: Recognising the sentience of farm animals, 2003
  21. Dr Suzanne Pope, above n. 2
  22. S Held et al, above n. 12

Did you like this article?
Facebook! Twitter